10.
New Aestheticism and Media Culture
Warren Neidich's
photographs comment on media events. They expose the way experience
is mediated through the complex apparatus of contemporary culture industries.
In addition, they engage self-consciously with the history of photographic
precepts that come from fine art, conceptual, and documentary traditions.
These images argue for a formal dialogue with culture and art history
and for a new aestheticism as a basis on which to discuss the relation
of fine art images to mainstream culture. But the only way to understand
the assertion of a "new" aestheticism is to place it in the
context of older precedents. In Neidich's case, that requires attention
to the specifics of photographic traditions as well as to the features
of engagement and affirmation that position his work within artistic
practices in the 1990s and 2000s.
_____Neidich sees his work in a postmodern
frame, following the historical lineage laid out by Hal Foster and others.[63]
That sequence describes a first wave of postmodernism that broke with
high modernism's focus on formal properties of media, a second wave
that occurred with the theoretically inspired work of the 1980s, and
a third, more recent, wave in which the artist functions as cultural
critic or "anthropologist."[64]
Neidich sees himself in this final role. But is this accurate? The cultural
critic posited by Foster retains the distanced stance of modern and
postmodern aesthetic negativity. However, Neidich's work suggest a complicity-not
so much with the values of mainstream culture and the entertainment
and media industries as instead with the enjoyment these provide.
Such observations return us to question the way a new formalism raises
issues of reflective engagement through its manifestations. This apparent
contradiction between an attitude of critical disjunction and one of
positive interaction with mass culture is sustained in Neidich's work.
His visual approach argues for a subjectivity that distances itself
from mainstream values and provides a point of view rooted in the real
and mythic idea of individual artistic perspective. But he also makes
use of the complicit pleasure that saturates media production values.
The powerfully present tension between these two elements (disjunction
and engagement) in Neidich's photographs foregrounds visual form as
aesthetic argument in contemporary art. This extends the arguments I'm
making for sculptural work, painting, hybrid media artifacts, installation
and video work, and digital art and the way these work out an admitted,
self-conscious relation to the culture industry through similar reinvestments
in aesthetics.
_____Center stage in the discussion of
aesthetics in the last few years was an argument put forth ardently
by Dave Hickey. At the beginning of the 1990s, Hickey's pronouncement
that "beauty" was to be the overriding concern of the decade
resonated through an art world that took up his charge with varied agendas.
To the visually starved, theory-weary audiences for whom the 1980s had
been a decade of mixed difficulties, the very idea of "beauty"
was a welcome, if insidious, relief. The critically overdetermined new
conceptualisms of Barbara Kruger, Sherrie Levine, Richard Prince, and
other artists had prepared the ground for this backlash. Receptivity
to Hickey's notion was accompanied with a certain smugness and satisfaction
at seeing the theory cart overturned in the name of something reassuringly
old-fashioned and familiar.
_____But the very familiarity of the term
"beauty" belied the complexity of concepts-and art political
agendas-that it concealed. For whose beauty were we to take as the standard?
Whose aesthetic investment was to be used as a measure against which
new forms might be assessed? In The Invisible Dragon, Hickey
dismissed this question are irrelevant, intent as he was on resurrecting
the potency of visual persuasion.[65]
Hickey succeeded by elegant argument. He made comparisons, for example,
between images by Mapplethorpe and Caravaggio, using the seductive idea
of a regime of aesthetic submission that carries sexual as well as artistic
overtones. By selecting such canonical and highly aesthetic works to
demonstrate the power of images to engage the viewer in a ritual surrounding
the "arrested moment" enacted therein, Hickey was able to
campaign for the salvific capacity of "beauty" to resurrect
the old notion of the "transcendent" value of fine art. Beauty
was not an index to circumstances of cultural production, in Hickey's
argument, but a way out of context in the name of aesthetic form. A
clever approach to theory-bashing. Hickey's work undercut political
correctness through indirect means, never mentioning identity politics
agendas but sidestepping them entirely with a retro-conservative position
that appealed by appearing to be above the fray of art world culture
wars. The aesthetic sensibility that Hickey prescribes is strictly formalist,
a stripped-bare closing of the circle of art into itself as a field
of reference.
_____But the aestheticism that we find
in Neidich is quite at odds with the "beauty" promoted by
Hickey. Neidich's aestheticism can't be cast into an old-fahioned formalism.
His is not a retro-gesture, a claim to ideal beauty through the purity
of form or out of history through a transcendent image. In this regard
he joins those artists of recent years for whom formal properties have
become again an invested instrument of communicative efficacy. I would
hesitate to cast all of 1980s postmodernism into a completely unaesthetic
category, through the "anti-aesthtic" announced in Hal Foster's
anthology of that title of 1983 indicates the attitudes of new York-style
postmodernism that were birthed under its shadow.[66]
Emphatically true, however, is that in the critical climate of the 1980s
and culminating in debates around the 1993 Biennial, appreciation was
never articulated as a formally based enterprise, this supporting the
sense that artists' work led with issues and ideas rather than through
a materially based rhetoric.
_____A substantive change occurred through
the course of the 1990s. Formal values were given a serious charge to
carry meaning through the capacity of material to communication semiotically
and sensually. The new aestheticism is a formalism informed
by conceptual art, critical theory, identity politics, and the satifactions
of studio practice in dialogue with media culture. In other words, this
is not revival of modernist formalism with its belief in the inherent
properties or purity of media. Neidich's work exemplifies the hybrid
integration of these once utterly distinct, even antithetical lineages,
an integration that prevails across the broader field of art production
in recent years.
_____Placing Neidich properly within the
history of contemporary art required a sketch of photographic practice
fraught with historically charged concerns, each of which has its own
relation to aesthetic properties. The Camp O.J. series produced at the
end of his cross-country, Kerouac-inspired, mythically heroic journey
(accordingly to the narrative supplied by the artist), is composed of
large-scale color images of the media camp struck up around the O.J.
Simpson trial (fig. 21).[67]
The title of the series alludes to the central reason for the existence
of the site and it appurtenances, but nothing in the images refers to
the trial or its issues in any significant way. This could be a media
encampment for a presidential race, a royal wedding, or any of the other
incidents that are daily fodder for the broadcast industry. Since the
mediation apparatus, not the event, is Neidich's subject, this is part
of the point, O.J. is very far off camera in the series, which makes
sense.

21 Warren
Neidich, Vanishing Point, part of the series Camp O.J., 2000,
photograph.
_____The
thematic obliqueness is matched in formal characteristics of the photographs
whose aesthetic precepts violate the standard conventions of fine photography.
Such systematic violations are very old news, of course. The lack of
focal emphasis, absence of hierarchical distinctions, fragmentation
of the scene, use of framing that is neither snapshot incidental nor
fine art fetishized, disregard for the protocols of photographic production
with no absolutely clear undermining of them, a sense of the documentary
impulse but without any statement of principles or editorial position-the
list of traits could go on. But they are used in Neidich's situation
with a very self-conscious sense of their history (and their cognitive
effect- Neidich's interest in vision and brain function is a developed
part of his approach to image production).[68]
Yes, he seems to be saying, all of this has been done and
will be done. In doing it himself he is not claiming invention or transgressive
violation of the terms of aesthetics. Rather, he acknowledges that since
those transgressions are now part of the stock-in-trade of photographic
practice, they are themselves highly coded aesthetic gestures. From
the moment of its invention in the early nineteenth century, fine art
photography's bid to "art" status depended on the elaboration
of a set of legitimizing aesthetic conventions (a capacity to demonstrate
its formal and expressive values). But the history of photography since
its acceptance as fine art in the twentieth century was characterized
by the same kind of medium-specific self-consciousness that occupied
other "modern" art. The elaborate taking apart of these conventions
derives from a dialogue within that tradition of the "composed"
versus the "found." Just as the fate of narrative within high
modernism improves in the postmodern condition, so the implied narratives
of Neidich's images engage the combined character of found and contrived
work. Their allegiance to the "found" gives them their documentary
credentials. Their engaged contrivance allows them to self-consciously
play with the frames and devices of postmodern artifice, made conspicuously,
visibly, present. Even the use of the fish-eye lens, with its distorting
gaze, calls attention to the fact that these are contrived photographs,
not mere "documents" pretending to transparent record.
_____Many of Neidich's apparently anti-aesthetic
features can be traced to conceptual art, which gave photography another
kind of legitimacy as "document" of the "immaterial"
acts and objects central to its rhetoric. The aesthetic force of conceptual
art art, its striking distinction between idea and artifact, became
the basis on which fine art could presumably eliminate production values.
The emphasis on "non-aesthtic" properties gave conceptual
photography distinction. Three decades later, this position has been
reintegrated with the suite of production tools available to an artist.[69]
The necessity for an anti-aesthetic is not as stringently defended-or
defensible-within the current cultural climate. We are weary of the
empty, unconstructed image that pretends not to care about its visual
appearance. Neidich's images contain that disregard as a posture, seeming
not to give in to the requirements of careful composition or traditional
aesthetics-but at the same they make every effort to fascinate through
visual means.
_____The editorial point of view in these
images demonstrates Neidich's participation in mediated culture. Neidich
doesn't position himself outside or above the life that he observes.
His depiction of persons, for instance, the newscaster, camera crews,
other technical and editorial members of media teams, is clearly without
malice of grotesquerie. Neidich is not cynical, but he is critically
concerned with how media fascination is produced. At the same time,
he is careful to make use of those principles to attract and keep his
viewers' attention. A photograph of a woman broadcaster, preparing herself
for the camera, shows her at the moment of taking on the persona she
projects through media. Her body is awkward, almost not her own. Her
costume is vivid, mall-bright, and her face and hair perfectly cosmeticized
to read into the technological feed. Yet she is vitally present as an
individual person whose is to perform a role. Her presence splits between
self and image, between embodied consciousness of the role she performs
and the role itself, hanging on her like her outfit, and yet, less separable
from her than those professionally coded clothes. A certain tragic tone
attaches to this image, and the mood casts its pall through the series
as a whole, showing that the process of producing "fascination"
is a complex activity of sleights and feints and duplicities performed
with earnestness and distance, professionalism and ironic recognition
in active, simultaneous contradiction.
_____Neidich cannot be simply pigeonholed
within a single historical tradition, which also speaks to the contemporary
condition of his aestheticism as a new formation rather than as a retorgressive
gesture. His work makes use of the full history of effects, in a highly
self-conscious manner, producing in the viewer an awarenss of critical
concerns as well as perceptual ones, all through properties of the images.
For instance, the obvious "unconstructedness" of these images,
the fragmented, ordered-disordered, apparently uncomposed and yet elaborately
selected, produces a visual field that has to be pierced back together
through a combination of looking and reading. Legible but not immediately
apparent, the structured bits have a random "life captured unawares"
aspect that is actually as artificially constructed as any tableau vivant.[70]
The prints are saturated, rich with embedded color. But for all their
large scale, they are not fetishized, deep-focus detailed works, and
they flaunt their allegiance to a fast-moving, on-the-fly, journalistic
mode with a deliberate disregard for either fine art quality or documentary
craft. Taken in sum, the aesthetic characteristics of these photos are
a series of sidesteps that jump off and away from quite recognizable
points of tradition.
_____The notion of laying bare any device
whatsoever carries with it the echoes of early twentieth-century avant-garde
practices whose earnest naiveté was suffused with belief in the
possibility of revealing the mechanisms of illusion in order to raise
political consciousness through aesthetic means. The current condition
of media saturation, of image glut and visual overstimulation, denies
us the luxury of such easy critical operations. We cannot simply "take
part" an image, any image, or work of art to show that its conceits
are merely a means of deception. The structures of engagement are too
complex in current (or indeed, in any) culture. The means of elaborate
production involve us through already internalized spectacular experience.
We are so inhabited by the images of media life and so complicit with
their fascination that taking them apart would serve very little function.
How does one undo the image according to which the very terms of self
and culture are constructed? An impossible task, like perceiving oneself
as whole from within the embodied mind. We are fully interpolated subjects.
The deconstruction of the spectacle in many ways just reinforces our
subjective and complicated relation to its many layered, interlocking
systems. In it, and of it, we are mediated creatures in our early millennial
lives. Neidich's images show this, claiming along the way in his particular
vocabulary of scientific, neurobiological critical parlance, that this
is a feature of the cultured brain in its specific historical moment.
Rather than ignore the potency of mediation, Neidich intends to engage
its affirmative capacity, its ability to seduce us through consumable
sensation.
_____Thus the avant-garde, with its resolutely
critical stance and distancing mechanisms of image production and execution,
is only a residual specter as it appears in Neidich's lens. This is
a quoted avant-garde, a citation and reference, not a living, pulsing
presence in real form. As a quotation, it marks our distance from the
historical moment of its appearance on the artistic stage and to give
us purchase on the distance from that point of origin. Neidich's rhetoric
embraces Foster's reinvented version of the avant-garde artist, that
savvy cultural critic. But the addictive capacity of media productions
translates into his own visual work. A fascination in looking at the
process of production permeates his photographs, and through the production
values they embody are far from those of mainstream media, they are
antithetical to it. Quite the contrary, if Neidich quotes the avant-garde
and its stance of critical interrogation, he also quotes and participants
in the look of trendy publications who photographs are produced for
entertainment value within the mainstream zones of spectacular consumption.
The glitz and celebritization, the exploitative voyeurism and journalistic
assertion into realm usually left invisible, unrecorded, are all present.
Neidich is playing paparazzi freelancer, professional with bulbs flashing
and an entrepreneurial instinct, seeking out events on which to feed
his appetite for anything that can be transformed into a photograph
for sale. The images are not "life taken unawares" but rather
life made aware in order to participate in the world of media and mediated
images. Living to be image, the media subjects of Camp O.J. are well
suited to such an approach.
_____Neidich's Camp O.J. series also shows
us the world in which "image" is always being produced and
put into circulation, but the angle through which Neidich looks at that
world inflects his images with a gratification that wasn't allowed within
the postmodern photographic photographic canon. Neidich knows that his
images are framed by the voyeuristic obsessions that the media produced
and fostered around the O.J. incident. By not showing the chief protagonists
of the tale and focusing instead on the mediating structures through
which the event of the trail is produced for spectacular consumption,
Neidich participates obliquely in the same system that he is slightly
to the side of. These images could be (and have been) published in a
photo-essay in a mainstream lifestyle magazine. They could be-and are-also
shown in galleries and museums. In this era of fine art fashion, the
slick products of Richard Avedon have claimed space on the museum and
gallery walls. The glamour industry's inroads into the citadel of fine
art may stir protests in certain quarters, but Neidich doesn't shy away
from this compromise. His "art" production, occurs in a variety
of site. This distinguishes him from those photographers who do commercial
work as a "day job" but preserve their "own" creativity
for fine art. His work also moves away from the affectless stance of
canonical postmodernism (Levine, Prince, Kruger) emblematic of the "already
produced" image-in-circulation sensibility. Like these postmodern
artists, Neidich clearly has a sense of mission. Art have something
to do, something it can do, and that only
it can do. What has changed is that his mission may not longer be fulfilled
by opposition. Quite the contrary. The most subversive act that fine
art can currently perform may well be to show its own complicity with
mainstream culture.
_____Fine art photographs provide a specifically
aesthetic form of mediation. To do this, of course, they be
aesthetic objects. They demonstrate that subjective affectivity can
be inscribed within an image. By showing that possibility they appear
to preserve the last vestige of a romantic sensibility in which the
artist is the line voice, the individual talent. After all, Neidich
chose that quintessential late-romantic on-the-road outsider Jack Kerouac
as his mythologized model. Doesn't that put Neidich right back into
the stereotype of the artist-hero, alienated in his own individualism?
_____Yes and no. Neidich's series positions
itself not simply in relation to fine art but also in relation to media
and the experience of existence mediate through images. The struggle
the fine artist faces is to find a formal vocabulary through which to
be distinct from mass culture while competing with it. How does one
engage the viewer outside of mass media while acknowledging the fully
colonized condition of the imagery? Perhaps very simply, by making artifacts
our of that experience, ephemeral testimonials to its having passed
through us. Contemporary existence is fully mediated, and through all
the systems described by critical opponents of the culture industry.
Fine art imagery, such as Neidich's, occupies only only a tiny, rarified
endangered zone in visual culture. Any functionality that attends to
such imagery, besides the immediate insight to the viewer, comes through
the set-aside to-be-seen aspect of its identity-as it does here-show
us something. That it shows us the backstage of the culture industry
is hardly a surprise. what else there to deconstruct? To interrogate?
To take apart and put before and audience? These gestures are not simply
an imitation of the visual culture production system, they are also
part of the culture's self-conscious reflection upon itself.
_____Mediation as a social process is crucial
to the artist's work, an object of fascination not only as an image,
but as a process of image production. Media trump fine, they overwhelm
it. The aesthetic force of these images is not what they depict, but
their demonstration of the way mediation can itself be captured as an
image and then cast back into the culture as a momentarily reflective
frame. These photographs affirm the seductions of the mass-produced
imagery and spectacle. The aesthetic of tine art if not "other"
than that of mainstream culture but exists as a space within it.
63.
In a panel discussion about his work Camp O.J. held at Bayly
Museum at the University of Virginia, November 2000.
64. Hal Foster, The Return of the Real (Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press, 1996), especially "The Artist as Ethnographer," 171-204.
65. Dave Hickey, The Invisible Dragon: Four Essays on Beauty
(Los Angeles: Art Issues Press, 1995), 35.
66. Hal Foster, The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture
(Port Townsend: Bay Press, 1983); Ann Goldstein and Mary Jane Jacob,
A Forest of Signs: Art in the Crisis of Representation, ed. Catherine
Gudis (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1989).
67. Warren Neidich, Camp O.J., intro. by Stephen Margulies,
essays by David Hunt and Charles Stainback (Charlottesville: The Museum,
2000).
68. Warren Neidich, Blow-Up: Photography, Cinema and the Brain
(NY: Distributed Art Publishers, 2003).
69. Lucy Souter's dissertation addresses this relation in detail, comparing
the work of fine art photographers and conceptual art photography and
assessing their formal and idealogical connections within shared lineages/traditions
and shared contemporary concerns. See Souter, "The Visual Idea:
Photography in Conceptual Art" (Ph.D diss., Yale University, 2001).
70. The phrase is, of course, from Soviet filmmaker Dziga Vertov. See
Annette Michelson, ed., Kino Eye: The Writings of Dziga Vertov,
trans. Kevin O'Brien (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994).